Many problems of the adult phase would be tied to the occured disfunes between the child and ' ' ambiente' ' , represented generally for the mother. It from there comes the idea of ' ' mother enough boa' ' , that according to author (they ibidem) that one whose perception – conscientious or unconscious – of the necessities of takes it to the baby to answer adequately to the different periods of training of the development of it. This makes with that if it creates an environment – nominated for it of holding (whose better translation for the Portuguese, would be ' ' colo' ') – propitious to a process of formation of one human being independent. ' ' The holding is the somatrio of aconchego, perception, protection and joy supplied by me' ' , it says. Something starts as vital, as the oxygen and the feeding, and if it dilutes as the baby grows. Although this winnicottiana characteristic to answer for the adequacy of an environment where the child can better develop itself, has many other aspects that we can analyze, of the point of view of the family. In first place, the family of asperger needs to accept its son with the syndrome, in according to place, the necessary family of confirmador a necessary diagnosis and for after that taking its more adequate measures in relation to the conduction of the behaviors between its members, for then, being able to facilitate the environment of the child and not to constranger it for ' ' diferena' ' that it loads in itself. In third place, it is necessary that, ahead of the diagnosis, the family can develop positive attitudes in relation to the son with SA, where the affection, the respect and the love can be constructed throughout its life, thus allowing, optimum possible performance of its daily activities, preventing, in such a way, the conflicts around the isolated behavior of asperger.

At the time, it worked in a Laboratory of Social Psychology and its idea was to produce a reflection space that placed in elitizada and isolated practical question of Sciences the Human beings of the time. For in such a way, it suggests that sciences if collate, particularly History, the Psychoanalysis and the Lingustica. This space of quarrel and understanding is called lards and the object that is studied there is ' ' discurso' '. Thus, it is I lard in it of you discipline that we can consider the discursiva reflection. Contemporary the Pcheux is Michel Foucault, also in France, and also bothered for similar questions, but considering one another one understanding way, that it also calls ' ' discurso' ' , for example in ' ' Archeologie du Savoir' '.

The speech of Pcheux is not the speech of Foucault. E, if to think about the tradition anglfone, in the distance increases, because the speech of Norman Fairclough also is not come close to the French questions. What we have are ways, different possibilities of understanding of a problem rank differently for each author. What it means that does not have one ' ' teoria' ' more accepted currently, but yes theoretical ways that answer and correspond in part to the reflection necessities that if they present. The Analysis of the Speech is one disciplines that if it has developed sufficiently in last the twenty years. Its theory follows two lines: the American and the Frenchman.

The French line, as already said, was established by the linguista Michel Pcheux and works with the citizen notion: nobody is agent of what it says, that is, we live the illusion of that we can make, say, criticize or produce sensible. It works with four basic points: the language, the ideology, History and the citizen. It defines speech as the felt effect of between speakers.